spacer spacer   spacer   spacer   spacer  
Title Header spacer
 
HOME
spacer
 
CONTACT
spacer
spacer  
SEARCH!
spacer
spacer
spacer
  NCDOT icon  NC DOT
  NCDOH icon  NC DOH
  NCgov.com icon  NC GOV
spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
 
 
spacer
 
Project Development   |    Natural Environment Unit   |    Human Environment Unit   |   
spacer
open spacer spacer
spacer The Merger Process spacer
spacer
spacer spacer spacer
Intro to the Merger Process
Merger Project Information
Guidance Documents
Meetings Calendar
Training
spacer
spacer spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer
   PDEA Home  >  The Merger Process  
spacer
spacer spacer  

Concurrence Points

For more detailed information on each concurrence point by type of project, click on appropriate process map and desired concurrence point.

Concurrence Point 1
Concurrence Point 2
Concurrence Point 2A
Concurrence Point 3
Concurrence Point 4A
Concurrence Point 4B
Concurrence Point 4C

Concurrence Points are defining points in the Section 404/NEPA Merger Process. Concurrence implies that each project team member and the agency they represent agrees to decisions made at these defining points in the project development process and in doing so pledges to abide by the decision made unless there is a profound changed condition. Concurrence is sequential and must be achieved in the proper order. The seven concurrence points (CP) in the Merger Process are as follows:

Concurrence Point 1: Purpose and Need and Study Area Defined
Purpose and Need and Study Area Defined: The foundation upon which justification of the project is established.

Concurrence Point 2: Detailed Study Alternatives Carried Forward (DSA)
Detailed Study Alternatives Carried Forward: Alternatives which satisfy the purpose and need for the project. These alternatives will be studied and evaluated in sufficient detail to ensure good transportation and permit decision-making.

Concurrence Point 2A: Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review: Identification of bridge locations and approximate lengths and a review of the preliminary alignment for each alternative.

Concurrence Point 3: LEDPA/Preferred Alternative Selection
LEPDA/Preferred Alternative Selection: The alternative selected as the "least environmentally damaging practicable alternative" or LEDPA (NEPA preferred alternative), through the project development and permitting process.

Concurrence Point 4A: Avoidance and Minimization
Avoidance and Minimization: A detailed, interdisciplinary and interagency review to optimize the design and benefits of the project while reducing environmental impacts to both the human and natural environment.

Concurrence Point 4B: 30 Percent Hydraulic Review
30 Percent Hydraulic Review; A review of the development of the drainage design.

Concurrence Point 4C: Permit Drawings Review
Permit Drawings Review: A review of the completed permit drawings after the hydraulic design is complete and prior to the permit application.


spacer spacer
spacer
 
North Carolina DOT Logo   The North Carolina
Department of Transportation